HDR Gateway logo
HDR Gateway logo

Bookmarks

Effectiveness of triple therapy versus dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have had one severe or two or more moderate exacerbations within one year

Safe People

Organisation name

Imperial College London

Organisation sector

Academic Institute

Applicant name(s)

Jennifer Quint - Chief Investigator - Imperial College LondonAlexander Adamson - Corresponding Applicant - Imperial College LondonCosetta Minelli - Collaborator - Imperial College London

Safe Projects

Project ID

CPRD28

Lay summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, progressive respiratory disease with continuing loss of lung function and symptoms such as shortness of breath and cough. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are the sudden worsening of COPD symptoms for a short space of time. For most people, the disease can be controlled through the daily use of two long-acting drugs that are taken using an inhaler (dual therapy). For some people who continue to get AECOPD despite being on dual therapy, an additional long-acting drug is recommended (triple therapy). The effectiveness of triple therapy compared to dual therapy is not clear, as it seems to reduce AECOPD but increase pneumonia infection and not affect mortality. This study will use information from de-identified primary care records of COPD patients to compare AECOPD and mortality in patients who continue on dual therapy after AECOPD compared to patients who are given triple therapy. This study will also look at whether there are differences in prescribing triple therapy according to GP practice, and differences in pneumonia rates, lung function, Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendance, and other drug prescriptions. This study will help to assess the advice given in medical guidelines.

Technical summary

The NICE guidelines state that triple therapy should be considered in patients on dual long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) + long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) therapy who experience 1 severe exacerbation or 2 or more moderate to severe exacerbations per year. This is based on randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence that found reductions in severe AECOPD, however these studies also found increases in pneumonia and no affect on mortality. We will therefore assess this recommendation in a population using routinely collected data comparing those eligible for triple therapy who remain on dual therapy to those who step up to triple therapy. We will use a retrospective cohort study design to assess the effect of triple therapy on the primary outcomes of severe AECOPD rate, moderate-severe AECOPD rate, and mortality, and the secondary outcomes of pneumonia rate, A&E attendances, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), breathlessness measured using the modified medical research council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale, and drug prescription, using Cox regression, multi-level linear regression and Poisson regression. Demographic variables, comorbidities, COPD baseline variables, and healthcare usage at baseline will be included as covariates in the model to reduce confounding. The study will incorporate trial evidence on the effectiveness on triple therapy using a Bayesian framework to help mitigate the impact of ‘confounding by indication’.

Latest approval date

13/05/2021

Safe Data

Dataset(s) name

HES Accident and Emergency

HES Admitted Patient Care

ONS Death Registration Data

Patient Level Index of Multiple Deprivation

Safe Setting

Access type

Release