Bookmarks
Urban-rural comparison of access to care and health outcomes for five major health conditions related to cardio-metabolic diseases, mental health and infectious diseases in England
Safe People
University of Heidelberg
Academic Institute
Till Bärnighausen - Chief Investigator - University of HeidelbergMaxime Inghels - Corresponding Applicant - University Of LincolnDavid Nelson - Collaborator - University Of LincolnEngelbert Bain Luchuo - Collaborator - University Of LincolnFrank Tanser - Collaborator - University Of LincolnJulia Lemp - Collaborator - University of HeidelbergPascal Geldsetzer - Collaborator - University of HeidelbergZahid Asghar - Collaborator - University Of Lincoln
Safe Projects
CPRD871
One out of seven UK citizens live in an area defined as rural. In UK, rurality is commonly viewed as places with healthy lifestyle and stressless environment. Results show that life expectancy is higher in those areas. Yet health inequalities persist across rural areas which presents a high heterogeneity in term of sociodemographic population but also imbalance medical service access. Studies suggest that rurality may exacerbate the effects of socio‐economic disadvantage, ethnicity, poorer service availability, higher levels of personal risk and more hazardous environmental, occupational and transportation conditions. Moreover, rural areas are challenged by an increasing ageing population which requires bespoke health services related to chronic care, mental health, as well as, preventable communicable disease.
Technical summary
26/01/2021
Safe Data
2011 Rural-Urban Classification at LSOA level
HES Accident and Emergency
HES Admitted Patient Care
HES Diagnostic Imaging Dataset
Mental Health Services Dataset (MHSDS)
ONS Death Registration Data
Patient Level Index of Multiple Deprivation
Pregnancy Register
Safe Setting
Release